Nina Bambeni | nina@radioislam.co.za
15th November 2023
1 min read
In a recent survey comparing the public opinion on Presidents Cyril Ramaphosa and Thabo Mbeki, Professor Dirk Kotze has raised concerns about the lack of information regarding the survey’s methodology and questioned its reliability in a diverse society.
Professor Kotze emphasised the importance of knowing the specific questions asked in the survey, as it plays a crucial role in interpreting the results accurately. He also expressed scepticism about the reliability of surveys in a society as diverse as South Africa.
One key aspect highlighted by Professor Kotze is the fundamental difference in the situations faced by Presidents Ramaphosa and Mbeki. While President Ramaphosa deals with the current challenges and decision-making for the country, President Mbeki is being evaluated based on his legacy and reputation, recalling his time in power.
President Ramaphosa’s tenure has been marked by multifaceted issues, ranging from the country’s financial state to corruption within the African National Congress (ANC). Professor Kotze emphasised that comparing the two leaders is akin to comparing apples with bananas, given the vastly different contexts and challenges they have faced.
The professor’s insights underscore the complexity of evaluating leadership in a dynamic and evolving political landscape. As the survey results circulate, the need for transparency in methodology and an understanding of the nuanced contexts surrounding each leader becomes increasingly evident. The diverse opinions within South Africa’s society further emphasise the challenges inherent in drawing conclusive comparisons from such surveys.
In conclusion, Professor Dirk Kotze’s commentary serves as a reminder to approach survey results critically, recognising the intricacies involved in evaluating leadership, especially in the context of diverse and evolving political landscapes.
Listen to the full interview on Sabahul Muslim with Sulaimaan Ravat and Prof Dirk Kotze here.
0 Comments