Sameera Casmod | sameerac@radioislam.co.za
17 January 2024 | 11:13 a.m. SAST
2-min read

Picture: Radio Islam International

ICJ hearings: Global spotlight on South Africa’s advocacy for justice

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) hearings took centre stage in global headlines, sparking intense debates and anticipation for the outcome. As the dust settles, Hafez Ibrahim Deen discusses the profound impact of South Africa’s representation of a non-member state and a third party on the Media Lens at Radio Islam International.

Established in 1946 after World War II, the ICJ has traditionally played a role in mediating disputes between states, primarily focusing on border issues and trade negotiations. The South African case, however, introduces a unique dimension, breaking from convention as the nation advocates for a non-member state and a third party, reminiscent of the Gambia’s involvement in the Myanmar genocide case.

The geopolitical landscape surrounding the ICJ proceedings has witnessed intriguing shifts. While Germany expressed solidarity with Israel, South Africa garnered support from unexpected quarters, including Indonesia. This development, coupled with backing from the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and countries like Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, and Indonesia, suggests that South Africa is making significant strides in the realm of soft power and human rights advocacy, Hafez Deen said.

The appeal to human rights, humanity, is gaining a lot of traction – Hafez Deen

Media coverage of the ICJ hearings has faced scrutiny, particularly concerning biases in reporting. South African media demonstrated extensive and balanced coverage, showcasing arguments from both sides. In contrast, Western media, notably the BBC, faced criticism for allegedly prioritising the Israeli perspective, with accusations of one-sided reporting.

Hafez Deen discussed the contrast in coverage between Western and non-Western media. The Western media’s delayed attention to South Africa’s arguments on the first day raised concerns about impartiality. Conversely, non-Western outlets, such as Al Jazeera, provided extensive coverage, contributing to a more nuanced understanding of the trial.

The role of social media emerged as a crucial factor, especially among the younger generation. In the United States, a significant demographic under 25 expressed support for the Palestinians, relying on alternative platforms like YouTube for live-streamed coverage.

Assessing the likely outcome of the ICJ hearings, concerns were raised about potential political interference influencing the judges’ decisions. The merits of the case, particularly the challenge of proving intent in a genocide, were discussed, with experts suggesting that South Africa may have a strong case.

Hafez Deen emphasised the potential significance of a legally binding decision, even if enforcement proves challenging. Such a decision, if in favour of South Africa, could challenge the historical unconditional support expressed by Western countries.

Listen to the Media Lens on Sabaahul Muslim with Moulana Sulaimaan Ravat.