Neelam Rahim | neelam@radioislam.co.za
3-minute read
17 July 2025 | 17:00 CAT

📸 ICC Holds Firm: Despite mounting global pressure, the International Criminal Court refuses to halt arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, reinforcing calls for accountability over alleged war crimes.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has dismissed Israel’s attempt to halt arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, escalating diplomatic fallout with powerful allies including the United States and European Union.

The decision underscores the ICC’s determination to uphold the rule of law despite what international law expert Professor Hennie Strydom called “bullying tactics by both Israel and the United States.” Speaking to Radio Islam International, Strydom emphasised that arrest warrants issued by the ICC are legally binding on all signatories to the Rome Statute. “There is an obligation under the Rome Statute determining that states, must cooperate with the court,” he explained.

Israel has argued that the ICC lacks jurisdiction over the Gaza conflict, but Strydom firmly dismissed this: “It’s been determined a long time ago, that it has jurisdiction over the occupied territories including Gaza. There’s no basis for [Israel’s] argument. It has no basis in law.”

Of particular concern are threats reportedly directed at ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan. Strydom warned that such actions “seriously undermine the court and international justice,” and reflect a dangerous precedent of political intimidation. “They’ve done it before, especially the United States,” he added.

While the ICC can issue arrest warrants, it lacks an enforcement arm, relying instead on state cooperation. “If [member states] do not comply, there’s nothing the court itself can do,” said Strydom. However, non-compliance can be challenged through diplomatic means at the annual Assembly of States Parties, which he said could “exert pressure to change the conduct we see developing now.”

Sanctions related to ICC rulings also carry personal consequences. Targeted individuals may face travel restrictions and financial complications. “They’re placed on a screening mechanism applicable to all banks,” Strydom noted, making international movement and banking difficult.

As global tension mounts, concerns are growing about the ICC’s long-term viability. “If this continues, the court may become totally ineffective,” Strydom warned, stressing the institution’s role in providing justice when domestic systems fail.

“If that court fails, victims of armed conflict will not be able to find a remedy,” he concluded.

The ICC’s resolve is being put to the test. Whether international justice can withstand such political pressure remains to be seen.

Listen to the full interview on Your World Today with Mufti Yusuf Moosagie and Professor Hennie Strydom.